ALL TOO HUMAN

My name is Adam, and I'am "All Too Human".

Listen! The Potential of Shared Hallucinations (1997)

We need a breakthrough here!

And questions can’t lead us to a breakthrough unless we’re willing to break something.

Before we can learn, before we can grow, we have to be prepared to listen.

What does it mean, to listen?

The word is commonly understood to mean “attentive hearing.”

It has its etymological origin in the archaic verb, list.

“List!” they used to say. “Ssh! List! The wild boar is outside!”

But the verb “list” also means to tilt something to one side.

When a sea vessel leans to starboard or port, it is said to be listing.

So how did the word “list” turn into the verb “listen?”

Because when we try to hear something, we sometimes cock our heads in the direction of the sound.

So to listen means more than to hear attentively.

The word also implies a change of inclination.

A new slant.

To listen is to put ourselves into a receptive attitude.

A position to be re-aligned.

To truly listen is to admit the possibility of upset.

If we regard the sum of the cognition of pure speculative reason as an edifice, the idea of which, at least, exists in the human mind, it may be said that we have in the Transcendental Doctrine of Elements examined the materials and determined to what edifice these belong, and what its height and stability. We have found, indeed, that, although we had purposed to build for ourselves a tower which should reach to Heaven, the supply of materials sufficed merely for a habitation, which was spacious enough for all terrestrial purposes, and high enough to enable us to survey the level plain of experience, but that the bold undertaking designed necessarily failed for want of materials […]. Immanuel Kant: The Critique of Pure Reason (translated by J. M. D. Meiklejohn) (via fuckyeahphilosophy)

History is a strong myth, perhaps, along with the unconscious, the last great myth. It is a myth that at once subtended the possibility of an »objective« enchainment of events and causes and the possibility of a narrative enchainment of discourse. The age of history, if one can call it that, is also the age of the novel. It is this fabulous character, the mythical energy of an event or of a narrative, that today seems to be increasingly lost. Behind a performative and demonstrative logic: the obsession with historical fidelity, with a perfect rendering […], this negative and implacable fidelity to the materiality of the past, to a particular scene of the past or of the present, to the restitution of an absolute simulacrum of the past or the present, which was substituted for all other value — we are complicitous in this, and this is irreversible. Because cinema itself contributed to the disappearance of history, and to the advent of the archive. Photography and cinema contributed in large part to the secularization of history, to fixing it in its visible »objective« form at the expense of the myths that once traversed it.

Today cinema can place all its talent, all its technology in the service of reanimating what it itself contributed to liquidating. It only resurrects hosts, and it itself is lost therein.

Jean Baudrillard: Simulacra and Simulation (translated by Sheila Faria Glaser) (via fuckyeahphilosophy)
(via mollysoda)

Saw this movie with my mom in 11th grade. She recormended it.

(via mollysoda)

Saw this movie with my mom in 11th grade. She recormended it.

Truth: A Medical History

fuckyeahphilosophy:

  • Coherence theories of truth
    • Coherence-systematic theories of truth
    • Criteriologic coherence theories of truth
    • Idealistic coherence theories of truth
    • Logico-empirical coherence theories of truth
  • Correspondence theories of truth
    • Identity theories of truth
    • Logico-empirical image theories of truth
    • Materialistic/reflective correspondence theories of truth
    • Ontologic-metaphysical correspondence theories of truth
  • Intersubjective theories of truth
    • Consensus theories of truth
    • Constructivist theories of truth
    • Dialogic theories of truth
    • Pragmatic theories of truth
  • Liguistic analysis theories of truth
    • Deflationary theories of truth
    • Formal-semantic theories of truth
    • Formal-semantic conditional theories of truth
    • Formal-semantic verificationist theories of truth
    • Fundamental-semantic theories of truth
    • Ordinary language theories of truth
    • Performative theories of truth
    • Redundancy theories of truth
  • Pluralist theories of truth
  • Semantic theories of truth
  • Revision theories of truth

… so, how are we feeling today?

Let’s go back to the example of the quest for designer children. To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, rather than to see children as objects of our design, or products of our will, or instruments of our ambition. It’s an interesting thing about parental love, if you think about it: parental love is not contingent on the talents and traits the child happens to have. It’s different from other human relations. We choose our friends, we choose our spouses at least partly on the basis of qualities that we find attractive. But we don’t choose our children, their qualities are unpredictable. […] As a result parenthood, more than any other human relationship, teaches us something […], it’s something that […] William May calls “An openness to the unbidden”. This idea of being open to the unbidden describes a quality of character and heart that restrains the impulse to mastery and control. It prompts a sense of life as gift. The deepest objection to genetic engineering for enhancement and designer children lies not so much in the perfection that it seeks, as in the human disposition it expresses and promotes. [….] And even if this disposition, the desire to control, doesn’t make parents tyrants to their children – it disfigures the relation between parent and child and deprives the parent of the humility and of the enlarged human sympathies that an openness to the unbidden can cultivate. Michael Sandel: The Case Against Perfection (via fuckyeahphilosophy)
It is a place that is now the official hipster neighborhood of the United States of America…I never thought that could exist here…I couldn’t believe it. It is so left wing, how do I even describe it…If you could see what this place looks like…Just think of the most left-wing hippie, lunatic, nutcase; get that in your head and multiply it by thousands. It is extremely scary…Tattoos and people who are high on drugs all day and they are wearing weird clothes, like something you can’t imagine, like a Hollywood picture, but here it was in the real world. Someone I was with said it’s like all the misfits in this country went to this neighborhood. There’s graffiti everywhere cuz they think graffiti is art…They are extreme leftists. I’ve never seen so many sick weirdos gathered in one place. They’re all doing drugs all day. They have their hair [dyed] and tattoos so they can’t have a job so they’re all living on public assistance…They love Obama and the leftists and hate police power. They’re carefree people. If I lived there a day, I tell you I would be in jail for murder…They don’t believe in toilet paper there because it hurts the environment…I think even some left-of-center Democrats would be grossed out.

Jay Mundy’s Williamsburg visit Via Brownstoner (via ronisolomondds)

Holy fucking shit, this man is onto something.

(via retrozone)

(via retrozone)